Noty chat america

Rated 4.62/5 based on 559 customer reviews

Splitting long articles and leaving adequate summaries is a natural part of growth for a topic (see Wikipedia: Summary style).Some topics are covered by print encyclopedias only in short, static articles, but Wikipedia can include more information, provide more external links, and update more quickly.

Predictions, speculation, forecasts and theories stated by reliable, expert sources or recognized entities in a field may be included, though editors should be aware of creating undue bias to any specific point-of-view.As explained in § Encyclopedic content above, merely being true, or even verifiable, does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.Wikipedia articles should not be: The University is not engaged in making ideas safe for students. Thus it permits the freest expression of views before students, trusting to their good sense in passing judgment on these views.Beyond that, "being objectionable" is generally not sufficient grounds for the removal of content.The Wikipedia: Offensive material guideline can help assess appropriate actions to take in the case of content that may be considered offensive.

Leave a Reply