What is radiometric dating dating curacao man
Thus radioactive dating relies purely on assumptions.
We could put forward the following counter arguments to the constancy of these assumptions: a) The constancy of cosmic ray bombardment might be questioned.
d) Even if the rate of decay is constant, without knowledge of the exact ratio of carbon-12 to carbon-14in the initial sample, the dating technique is subject to question.
It's assumed that the clock was set to zero when the study material was formed.
If even a small percentage of the limestone deposits were still in the form of living marine organisms at the time of the Flood, then the small amount of carbon-14 would have mixed with a much larger carbon-12 reservoir, thus resulting in a drastically reduced ratio.
Specimens would then look much older than they actually are.
Scientists place great faith in this dating method, and yet more than 50% of radiocarbon dates from geological and archaeological samples of northeastern North America have been deemed unacceptable after investigation.
A further example from a lava flow off the coast of Hawaii shows similar discrepancies.
Did you know that you can be a Christian, and believe that the earth is billions of years old?
You can even believe in evolution and be a Christian.
No scientist can guarantee that any sample can be considered a closed system unless it was isolated from its environment when it was formed.
Elements can be transported into a sample or leach out of a sample.